The next Motorola terminal that has become known is called Moto G FORTE, which is a variant of its well-known mid-range model and which would have one of its best characteristics in increasing its resistance. Therefore, the commitment to this product range is maintained, but with new features.
The known leak indicates that one of the first locations in which this new model can be purchased will be in the Latin American region, but it is not ruled out that it may be part of the game elsewhere. By the way, there is already an image of what could be a future model that, as on many other occasions, comes from the account @ Evleaks of Twitter.
As can be seen in the photograph that we leave below, the construction of the Moto G FORTE is much more resistant (and thick), so it is clear that holding up much more than the original model is something that is obviously intended. What's more, there is even speculation that this device is Waterproof, so it would be compatible with or with the IP68 or IP68 standard - if we have to bet, we would do it for the first one.
Motorola Moto G Forte, will arrive in Latin America with improved durability. pic.twitter.com/xqyUe9atSw
- @evleaks (@evleaksES) March 28th, 2014
As can be seen in the image, aesthetically this model looks a lot like previous Motorola Defy, even more than the original Moto G. In addition, everything indicates that the new model will not allow changing the back cover. By the way, it is striking that the side buttons are very prominent.
As for the specifications that can be started in the Moto G FORTE, it would be similar to the known ones offered by the terminal that is already on sale in Spain: 4,5-inch screen at 720p, processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 with four cores, 1 GB of RAM and, also, a storage capacity that reaches eight “gigs”. For now there is no official information regarding details such as the launch date and prices, but the truth is that the arrival of this terminal sounds pretty good, which, hopefully, will be launched globally.
Source: @ Evleaks
I think you were wrong in:
(…) IP68 or IP68 -if we have to bet, we would do it for the first- (…)