Sometimes you work in the wrong direction, or with the wrong staff. What Google had created with Android at that time only know those who created it. But what we do know is that that was worthless when Steve Jobs introduced the new iPhone. Google had to start from scratch in its development with Android, although the work has been worth it.
So says Chris DeSalvo, a Google software specialist, whose heart was split in two when the new iPhone was announced. He himself says that as a consumer he could not do anything other than want to get hold of one of the new iPhone that Steve Jobs had just presented back in 2007. However, as a Google engineer the situation was very different, because he knew that it that they had done was not worth to compete with Apple, and that they would have to start working from scratch on the operating system they had created.
A round the world
Before that, Google engineers had been working very hard on the new operating system, on the new mobile to launch. They had gone to different parts of the world, trying to determine what the new mobile they were going to launch would look like. They wanted to surprise, they wanted to launch something different, something that no one expected. They hadn't just been copying, but had been working on something totally new that they felt was better than anything else on the market. And that's why the surprise was so great when Apple introduced the new iPhone.
The wrong target
Google was wrong when looking for competition. The goals that Google had at that time were wrong. Apparently, the company was trying to create a mobile that would rival Microsoft's phones. They had seen the competition in Redmond, and it all boiled down to launching a better operating system than the one they had, a much better mobile than the ones launched on the market with Windows Mobile. At that time, improving Microsoft on mobile operating systems was very different from what it is now, as it meant completely revolutionizing the landscape of smartphones.
The biggest mistake Google made was not realizing that another company could be working towards the same goal, it could have much more money and resources than they did, and it could take a lot longer trying to create the product, as well as a more qualified staff. . Today Google is a very large company, but at that time it was not as big as Apple. Although, it must be said, Apple was not as big as it is now, but at least it had a very great history, and a financing that probably only a few technology companies could afford, in addition to a genius like Steve Jobs, who knew a lot. more for old than for genius.
Reduce the situation
But of course, the fact that a company had launched a better product did not make Google wrong again. The most normal thing would have been that they would have launched their product, hoping that users would receive it better, although that would have been a total failure in the long run. It is the example of what some companies are doing today. Instead, they started from scratch with their operating system instead, totally changed what they were going to do, and released a system that other manufacturers could use. Today, they dominate the market share, with an abysmally higher percentage than iOS. And although they have taken a long time to catch up with those of Cupertino, and there will be many users who will prefer iOS, it is undeniable that the success of Google is such that no other operating system can compare with this.
The same stone
Of course, all companies in the market have to be careful that the same thing does not happen this time, not to make a mistake thinking that the rival is a company that is not. In 2007, the most powerful rival appeared to be Microsoft, and Apple seemed to have nothing to do with the mobile phone market. Today the opposite could happen. Google is not the strongest rival, although it seems so, and Microsoft is not the weakest, although the numbers say so. They have done a great job, and Redmond could have a weapon ready to end the dominance of Apple and Google in the market for mobile operating systems.
Even if they put the source: elandroidelibre. It is almost the same (not to say completely) to the article they published about two days ago….